Skip to content
MARTENSVILLE · DECISION WORKSHEET

Martensville guide: identify actual citizenship while comparing two job descriptions

USAvisa field guide · 2 minute readReviewed 7 September 2026

Read the general eligibility basics overview

THE SHORT ANSWER

A choice between roles does not determine nationality eligibility. Keep the applicant’s citizenship and Canadian residence separate from the employer’s preferred category. The first decision is whether the principal has the nationality required for the chosen category on the relevant date. Permanent-resident documents, tax residence, a Canadian address and a future citizenship application may matter elsewhere, but none should be treated as proof of citizenship. A route review then identifies the separate employment, ownership or investment records needed for that category.

01

Record the personal nationality evidence

Canadian permanent residence is not Canadian citizenship. TN requires the principal to be Canadian or Mexican and meet the professional conditions. Neither a senior title nor a Canadian address establishes that citizenship requirement. Hypothetical example: A pastry chef is a Canadian permanent resident whose citizenship ceremony is scheduled after a proposed U.S. start date. The household must decide whether to change the timing or assess another lawful route; the invitation or expected ceremony cannot be presented as completed citizenship.

02

Assess the real alternatives independently

L requires qualifying foreign employment, a related-company relationship and an appropriate U.S. capacity, with continuing international business. E-2 requires relevant treaty nationality and qualifying enterprise ownership, investment and direction. A second job description does not automatically make an unavailable route available. For an L proposal, start with ownership documents, a work chronology and proof of operating businesses before comparing the planned U.S. duties. For E-2, trace treaty nationality, enterprise ownership, real authority and capital documents. These records answer different questions, so an employer's preference cannot move proof from one route to another.

03

Preserve the household’s individual facts

Hypothetical example: the principal and spouse hold different passports. Identify the actual intended statuses and document requirements for each. Do not assume that one person’s route or nationality eliminates the other person’s need for individual assessment. Each family member needs an individual document and status review even when travel is coordinated. Decide whose nationality supports the principal case, whose relationship supports derivative processing, and which timing assumptions remain unproven. What goes wrong is treating a household summary as if it supplied identical eligibility to every person.

SOURCE NOTES

Editorial source review: 2026-09-07. General preparation guidance, not an individual assessment.

A CONVERSATION IS A GOOD PLACE TO START.

WHAT’S YOUR
NEXT CHAPTER?

Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.

Book a free consultation Or call +1 639 638 3326